Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Synopsis: Candidates in U.S. and Canadian elections should push for a pull out of UNESCO due to fraudulent manipulation of climate change data & racketeering trade of carbon emissions under Kyoto.
Open e-mail messages sent February 12, 2007 to:
U.S. Vice-President Richard Cheney vice_president@...
Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper pm@...
Kristine Marcy and Bruce McConnell,
Executive Consultants, McConnell International LLC,
1301 K Street Northwest, Suite 450, West Washington, DC
Tel: 202-289-8800 contactus@...
CEO and Co-founder of Tomoye Corporation,
1425 K Street Northwest, Suite 350, West Washington, DC
Tel: (202) 587-5611, (819) 246-9007 esauve@...
Captain Field McConnell and David Hawkins, Forensic Economists at Hawks' CAFE http://www.hawkscafe.com/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hawkscafe/
Dear Prime Minister Harper and Vice-President Cheney:
Re: Kyoto racketeering, UNESCO climate fraud
Hawks CAFE believes that candidates in the U.S. 2008 presidential election and the next Canadian federal election should campaign on pulling their countries out of UNESCO because this Paris organization is fraudulently manipulating climate-change data in order to conceal racketeering and insider trading of carbon emissions under the Kyoto Protocol.
Voters must be reminded that the godfather of the Kyoto Accord, the Canadian high school drop out and depopulationist Maurice Strong, is a Stalinist, a Saddam bribee and the architect of a $100 billion UN Oil-for-Food fraud upon the sovereign nation of Iraq.
Maurice Strong is presently hiding out in China to avoid becoming a co-defendant in the Iraq Oil-for-Food bribery and influence-peddling case with UN bagman, Tongsun Park.
Strong's pseudo theory that man-made (anthropogenic) carbon dioxide is the cause of climate change and global warming, is invalidated by testing his argument backwards.
If Strong were correct, the earth would get cooler as we go back in time to the pre-industrial era.
Arguing backwards over the last 400,000 years, we find that the Strong's theory is invalidated because carbon dioxide turns out to be a lagging (800 years) indicator of global warming, i.e. CO2 variations result from global warming driven primarily by
a) variations in received intensity of electromagmetic radiation from the sun
b) variations in thermal flux from ocean currents
c) variations in relative humidity and cloud cover
d) variations in natural flux of carbon dioxide (man's contribution immeasurably small).
Hawks CAFE can prove that Maurice Strong and his CO2 trader friends are lying; that the self-styled "guerrilla knowledge managers" with Canadian company, Tomoye of Gatineau, Quebec, and, with McConnell International of Washington, D.C., are manipulating public climate data, and, that UNESCO is a corrupt front for racketeering private-equity confiscation of property belonging to so-called 'climate change deniers'.
Hawks CAFE will therefore help political candidates in Canada and America to campaign on a pull out from UNESCO and the filing of civil RICO claims for property frauds against the various Kyoto loan syndicates, including CAI-Carlyle Canada private equity groups and UN Oil-for-Food scamster banks, BNP Paribas and JPMorganChase.
28 year airline and 22 year military pilot,
23,000 hours of safety
David Hawkins hawks-cafe@...
Notes: "Kyoto racketeering, UNESCO climate fraud"
Private equity groups in racketeering confiscation of property, ".. 20 pieces of American property have been designated as "World Heritage Sites" and so identified with markers. These include Yellowstone and Yosemite national parks, the Grand Canyon, Thomas Jefferson's home Monticello, and, believe it or not, the Statue of Liberty. All of these markings took place without any publicity, without the American people knowing what was going on. The designation of these World Heritage Sites was authorized by the World Heritage Convention, a treaty signed by President Richard Nixon and ratified in 1973. The World Heritage Program is carried out by UNESCO, to which the United States doesn't even belong. President Ronald Reagan pulled us out of UNESCO because it was totally corrupt. The UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Program was created in 1970. The United States joined in 1974 when our State Department signed a memorandum of understanding (not a treaty) to put us in the Biosphere Program and pledge that the United States will adhere to the Biosphere conditions and limitations laid down by UNESCO. Paragraph 44 of the World Heritage Operational Guidelines states that "natural" Heritage Sites (as contrasted to "cultural") can be interchanged with "core reserves" of the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Program. These core protected areas are planned to be surrounded by highly regulated buffer zones, all for the sake of "biodiversity."
UNESCO is the principal promoter of fraudeulent climate data, `Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis': a new assessment of the state of knowledge on climate change: Climate change is having a significant impact on weather patterns, precipitation and the hydrological cycle, affecting surface water availability, as well as soil moisture and groundwater recharge. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is meeting at UNESCO headquarters in Paris, France from 29 January to 1 February 2007, to finalize the 1st volume of the report: `Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis'. This volume will assess the current scientific knowledge of the natural and human drivers of climate change, observed changes in climate, the ability of science to attribute changes to different causes, and projections for future climate change."
President of Czech Republic recognizes that "Man-Made Global Warming" is a myth and questions Gore's sanity, "A: It's not my idea. Global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so. It is not fair to refer to the U.N. panel. IPCC is not a scientific institution: it's a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavor. It's neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment. Also, it's an undignified slapstick that people don't wait for the full report in May 2007 but instead respond, in such a serious way, to the summary for policymakers where all the "but's" are scratched, removed, and replaced by oversimplified theses.• This is clearly such an incredible failure of so many people, from journalists to politicians. If the European Commission is instantly going to buy such a trick, we have another very good reason to think that the countries themselves, not the Commission, should be deciding about similar issues"